-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ian Collins:
> I doubt zfs receive would be able to keep pace with any non-trivial update
> rate.
one could consider this a bug in zfs receive :)
> Mirroring iSCSI or a dedicated HA tool would be a better solution.
i'm not sure how to apply iSCSI here; the pool needs to be mounted at least
read-only on both hosts at the same time. (also suggested was AVS, which
doesn't allow keeping the pool mounted on the slave.) at least Solaris
Cluster, from what i've seen, doesn't allow this either; the failover is
handled by importing the pool during failover.
- river.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFJG2ltIXd7fCuc5vIRAv5PAJ4lrVLcWuQlJkY05fxCYkLn8kgtxQCgo/CX
Ae17uVMuX1FABt73hmeULmM=
=OZZa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
