On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM, River Tarnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ian Collins: >> That's very slow. What's the nature of your data? > > mainly two sets of mid-sized files; one of 200KB-2MB in size and other under > 50KB. they are organised into subdirectories, A/B/C/<file>. each directory > has 18,000-25,000 files. total data size is around 2.5TB. > > hm, something changed while i was writing this mail: now the transfer is > running at 2MB/sec, and the read i/o has disappeared. that's still slower > than > i'd expect, but an improvement. > >> Time each phase (send to a file, copy the file to B and receive from the >> file). When I tried this on a filesystem with a range of file sizes, I had >> about 30% of the total transfer time in send, 50% in copy and 20% in receive. > > i'd rather not interrupt the current send, as it's quite large. once it's > finished, i'll test with smaller changes... > > - river. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iD8DBQFJE4mXIXd7fCuc5vIRAv0/AJoCRtMBN1/WD7zVVRzV2n4xeqBvyACeLNL/ > rLB1iHlu4xZdUPSiNj/iWl4= > =+F7d > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
Theres been a couple threads about this now, tracked some bug ID's/ticket: 6333409 6418042 66104157 If you wanna see the status -- Brent Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
