On Mon 03/11/08 08:11 , dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: > On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:16:29 +1300 > Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > .com> wrote: > > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > > SUN advices to create a seperate zfs > filesystem for every zone.> > # zfs create -o canmount=noauto > rpool/ROOT/s10BE/zones> > # zfs mount > rpool/ROOT/s10BE/zones> > # zfs create -o canmount=noauto > rpool/ROOT/s10BE/zones/zrootA> > And so on for every zone. > > > This takes memory. Can't I do with a > rpool/ROOT/s10BE/zones and> > create directories into it for every zone, > instead of seperate ZFS> > filesystems? What are the > (dis)advantages?> > > > All the usual advantages of finer grained > control. Unless you have a> marginal system, the overhead if any is > minimal.> > > Live Upgrade will do this (create an FS per > zone) for you when you> migrate from UFS to ZFS boot. > > Live Upgrade does -NOT- do this on my system. Updating s10u4 to s10u5 > was already like hell. But also s10u6 is not able to copy my zones. I > have -NO- idea why. A simple three sparse zones on a slice mounted > on /zones. I got the same errors and had to use the same trick. > Did you follow the instructions at
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/ggpdm?a=view ? -- Ian. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
