On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 06:09:30PM -0500, Tim wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Ahmed Kamal < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, for everyone saying zfs is more reliable because it's closer to the > > application than a netapp, well at least in my case it isn't. The solaris > > box will be NFS sharing and the apps will be running on remote Linux boxes. > > So, I guess this makes them equal. How about a new "reliable NFS" protocol, > > that computes the hashes on the client side, sends it over the wire to be > > written remotely on the zfs storage node ?! > > Won't be happening anytime soon.
If you use RPCSEC_GSS with integrity protection then you've got it already. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
