Cyril Plisko wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Just one more things on this: >> >> Run with a 64-bit processor. Don't even think of using a 32-bit one - >> there are known issues with ZFS not quite properly using 32-bit only >> structures. That is, ZFS is really 64-bit clean, but not 32-bit clean. >> >> > > Wow ! That's a statement. Can you provide more info on these 32-bit issues ? > I am not aware of any. In fact besides being sluggish (presumably due > to limited address space) I never noticed any issues with ZFS, which I > used on 32-bit machine for 2 years. > >
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=212508𳸜 Looking through the Bug database, it seems that a good chunk of 32-bit-related problems have been resolved. However, there hasn't been a general fix for the overall issue noted in the above discussion. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
