On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Keith Bierman wrote:
>>> ...
>>> That is reasonable.  It adds to product cost and size though.
>>> Super-capacitors are not super-small.
>>>
>> True, but for enterprise class devices they are sufficiently small. Laptops
>> will have a largish battery and won't need the caps ;> Desktops will be on
>> their own.
>
> The Intel SSDs are still not advertised as enterprise class devices.

This is clear from what Intel have already said and what the reviewers
have "regurgitated".  SSDs with "M" in the part number are
consumer/mainstream type devices using Intel/Micron MLC flash parts
and come with a 3 year warranty.  The "E" parts numbers are intended
for enterprise users and will use Intel/Micron SLC flash parts.
Performance characteristics, pricing and warranty have not been
published - altough the rumored numbers look very good.  The "E"
series drives are already sampling, so it won't be very long before we
know all the details.  My guess is that Sun will be basing their
upcoming SSD products on Intel technology...

My reason for posting this to the list is to try to be helpful and let
folks know about SSD related news/reviews that they may have missed.
There are lots of applications for "M" series SSDs in a ZFS based
environment, for example, any application where the workload is mostly
read only and the access pattern is random.  Serving up CD and DVD
sized ISO images comes immediately to mind. In this application a
single M series drive providing 4,500 IOPS would be
cost/power/cooling/size/price competitive against five 73Gb 15k RPM
SAS drives.

Regards,

-- 
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc,Plano,TX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: 972.379.2133 Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to