Thanks Michael for the clarification about the IDR ! :-) I was planing to give this explaination myself.
The fix I have in there is a temporary fix. I am currently looking at a better way of accounting the fatzap blocks to make sure we cover all the cases. I have got some pointers from Mark Maybee and am looking into it right now. Thanks and regards, Sanjeev. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:59:07AM -0700, Michael Schuster wrote: > On 08/29/08 04:09, Tomas ?gren wrote: > > On 15 August, 2008 - Tomas ?gren sent me these 0,4K bytes: > > > >> On 14 August, 2008 - Paul Raines sent me these 2,9K bytes: > >> > >>> This problem is becoming a real pain to us again and I was wondering > >>> if there has been in the past few month any known fix or workaround. > >> Sun is sending me an IDR this/next week regarding this bug.. > > > > It seems to work, but I am unfortunately not allowed to pass this IDR > > IDR are "point patches", built against specific kernel builds (IIRC) and as > such not intended for a wider distribution. Therefore they need to be > tracked so they can be replaced with the proper patch once that is available. > If you believe you need the IDR, you need to get in touch with your local > services organisation and ask them to get it to you - they know the proper > procedures to make sure you get one that works on your machine(s) and that > you also get the patch once it's available. > > HTH > Michael > -- > Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion > Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion' > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
