Just saw this blog post linked from the register, it's EMC pointing out that their array wastes less disk space than either HP or NetApp. I'm loving the 10% of space they have to reserve for snapshots, and you can't add more o_0.
HP similarly recommend 20% of reserved space for snapshots, and NetApp recommend a whopping 100% (that was one reason we didn't buy NetApp actually). Could anybody say how ZFS would match up to these figures? I'd have thought a 14+2 raid-z2 scheme similar to NFS' would probably be fairest. http://chucksblog.typepad.com/chucks_blog/2008/08/your-storage-mi.html Ross -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
