Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "mb" == Marc Bevand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mb> Ask your hardware vendor. The hardware corrupted your data, > mb> not ZFS. > > You absolutely do NOT have adequate basis to make this statement. > > I would further argue that you are probably wrong, and that I think > based on what we know that the pool was probably corrupted by a bug in > ZFS. Simply because ZFS is (a) able to detect problems with hardware > when they exist, and (b) ringing an alarm bell of some sort, does NOT > exhonerate ZFS. and AIUI that is your position. > > Further, ZFS's ability to use zpool-level redundancy heal problems > created by its own bugs is not a cause for celebration or an > improvement over filesystems without bugs. The virtue of the
There are no filesystems without bugs. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
