On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Cesare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hy,
>
> I'm facing to a problem where I configure and create a zpool on my
> test bed. The hardware is: T-5120 with Solaris10 with latest patch and
> Clariion CX3 attached by 2 HBA. In this type of configuration every
> LUN exported by Clariion is viewed 4 times by operating system.
>
> If I configure the latest disk by using a controller the "zfs create"
> doesn't working telling me that there is a devices currently
> unavailable. If I'll use a different controller  (but is the same LUN
> from the Clariion) I'll not encountered the problem and the raidz pool
> is created. I'm willing to use that controller for balance the I/O
> between HBA and storage processor.

My experience is that zfs + powerpath + clariion doesn't work.

(Try a 'zpool export' followed by 'zpool import' - do you get your pool back?)

For this I've had to get rid of powerpath and use mpxio instead.

The problem seems to be that the clariion arrays are active/passive and
zfs trips up if it tries to use one of the passive links. Using mpxio hides
this and works fine. And powerpath on the (active/active) DMX-4 seems
to be OK too.

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to