On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Orvar Korvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ouch, that seems slow. Do you think ZFS is still the best solution for this > work load, or would for instance Veritas do better?
I suspect that raidz specifically (rather than zfs in general) isn't very good for small random read access. That said, it's a difficult workload. My limited experience of (the rather more expensive) Veritas on (rather more expensive) big arrays is that they don't handle it particularly well either. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
