Perhaps someone else can correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're using the whole disk, ZFS shouldn't be displaying a slice when listing your disks, should it? I've *NEVER* seen it do that on any of mine except when using partials/slicese.
I would expect: c1d1s8 To be: c1d1 On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Michael Armbrust < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2008, at 7:42 PM, Tim wrote: > > What's on the rest of the disk? > > > Nothing, when I created the pool I used the entire disk. > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Michael Armbrust < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have a pool of four raidz-ed drives that I created in BSD that I would > > like to move to a box with a solaris kernel. However, when I run zpool > > import it displays the following message: > > > > pool: store > > id: 7369085894363868358 > > state: UNAVAIL > > status: The pool was last accessed by another system. > > action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. > > see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-EY > > config: > > > > store UNAVAIL insufficient replicas > > raidz1 UNAVAIL corrupted data > > c1d1s8 UNAVAIL corrupted data > > c1d0s2 ONLINE > > c2d0s2 ONLINE > > c2d1p0 ONLINE > > > > I know the drives/sata card are actually good, because when I move it > > back to the old system it imports without a problem. Why can't Solaris > > import this pool? Even if one of the drives did have corrupted data, why > > can't I import anyway and just recreate it from parity information? Any > > ideas? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Michael > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zfs-discuss mailing list > > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
