I have a customer who has implemented the following layout: As you can see, he has mostly raidz zvols but has one raidz2 in the same zpool. What are the implications here? Is this a bad thing to do? Please elaborate.
Thanks, Scott Gaspard [EMAIL PROTECTED] > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > chipool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > spares > > c4t4d0 AVAIL > > c7t4d0 AVAIL _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
