Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> > [...] ISO-8859-1 (the low 8 bits of UNOICODE) [...]
>
> Unicode is not an encoding, but you probably mean "the low 8 bits of
> UCS-2" or "the first 256 codepoints in Unicode" or somesuch.

Unicode _is_ an encoding that uses 21 (IIRC) bits.

UCS-2 is a way to _represent_ the low 16 bits of UNICODE in a way that allows 
to 
use some tricks go bejund 16 bits. Microfoft e.g. does not go bejund 16 bits.

ISO-8859-1 is a representation of the low 8 bits of UNICODE (well ISO-8859-1
is older than UNICODE ;-). ISO-8859-1 does not allow to code more than the
8 least sinificant bits from unicode.



Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to