Tim wrote:

> Don't forget, ZFS is open source, and can be ported to any other 
> number of platforms as well.  It's also currently supported on FreeBSD 
> 7.0, and is basically production ready on that platform.
>
> The open source is HUGE in my mind, you aren't tied to Solaris.  
> Granted, that is where the main development is taking place right now, 
> but if Sun were to fold up shop, or kill off solaris 
> *cough*netware*cough*, zfs isn't going anywhere, and your data should 
> be portable.
>
> I'm going to be blunt, and probably will rile up a few trolls if there 
> are any on this mailing list:
> If you're talking to anyone still on netware, they're a netware 
> zealot, and nothing you can say is going to change that. 
> If they haven't found a reason to throw netware under the bus yet, 
> they aren't going to.  No reasonable argument as to why ZFS is 
> superior to NSS will be heard, there will always be some caveat (ITS 
> NOT SUPPORTED BY NOVELL!!!11), as to why it's just not a good enough 
> reason to switch. 

Out of the Novell-types at the talk, one was a Novell "zealot" and the 
rest were just folks who make a living supporting Novell customers.  
Also, NSS was apparently been ported to Linux.

alan

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to