Jill Manfield wrote: > Platform T2000 > SunOS ccluatdwunix1 5.10 Generic_125100-10 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200 > > I have a user that stated zfs is allocating more file system space than > actually available via ls command versus what df -k shows.
Here's the same file on UFS and on ZFS with different record size. du shows different space consumption. Here's the file on UFS: -rw------- 1 root root 139733 Jan 24 17:38 /foo.txt 152K /foo.txt Here is the file on ZFS with records size of 128K, 512 bytes, and 8K (I think this is the UFS default block size). -rw------- 1 root root 139733 Jan 24 17:42 /tank/big/foo.txt 258K /tank/big/foo.txt -rw------- 1 root root 139733 Jan 24 17:42 /tank/small/foo.txt 168K /tank/small/foo.txt -rw------- 1 root root 139733 Jan 24 17:44 /tank/ufssize/foo.txt 147K /tank/ufssize/foo.txt I think that's what your customer is seeing. CT _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
