Hi, On 21/12/2007, at 6:43 AM, msl wrote:
> Hello mr. Irvine, > Did you fix that? No > Do you have a solaris formal support? No. However I did upload the crash dump files and I was hoping that a Solaris engineer might have found them "interesting". I was going to move the zpool to a new machine that did - but alas it was early days for me and ZFS: I used slices rather than whole disks when creating my original zpool. We were going to rent a big array to help us do some juggling. > I mean, they will fix the problem in your solaris 10 production > server, or you will need to upgrade to a "opensolaris" version? Actually, I now know that it also core dumps with OpenSolaris update 77 - not as often, but as often - but once a day is too often. Fortunately this is for backups rather than live file systems. > I'm deploying a ZFS environment, but when i think about "TB" and > "how mature" is ZFS... i don't know. I was going to use zfs in my whole environment. I still like ZFS, but for crucial production systems I think we will be sticking with Veritas VxFS for now... shame. > My concern is just the problem that you have: "Have a TB zfs pool, > and occurs a but like this". So, i will need restore the entire > pool from backup? no way... > Take a look here: > > http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/11/28/is-zfs-ready-for- > primetime/ > Yes - I have put one of the entries in. > The features of ZFS are really import and great, but the above > situation and the problem that you have faced is a concern. Agreed and agreed. > Leal. > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
