Marion Hakanson wrote: > The downside is that you do lose some of the flexibility of ZFS, mainly > that snapshots are now done on whole UFS filesystems (zvol's), and access > to snapshots is not available via the .zfs/snapshot/ path. ZFS ACL's on > the individual file level are also not possible with this scenario.
That is an interesting solution. > Of course, ZFS is open-source. I wonder if anyone has started implementing > user and/or group quotas for ZFS yet.... I do not mind not having user quotas in zfs, the file-system way is interesting. But it is annoying that NFS is still bound by file-system, even in "these times". But there probably is some implementational reason why it can't be "fixed". If it was just that statfs() would report incorrect values, but write() fail with ENOSPC, this would be acceptable to me. -- Jorgen Lundman | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work) Shibuya-ku, Tokyo | +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (cell) Japan | +81 (0)3 -3375-1767 (home) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
