On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Tim Cook wrote:

> So I have 8 drives total.
>
> 5x500GB seagate 7200.10
> 3x300GB seagate 7200.10
>
> I'm trying to decide, would I be better off just creating two separate pools?
>
> pool1 = 5x500gb raidz
> pool2= 3x300gb raidz

... reformatted ...

> or would I be better off creating one large pool, with two raid 
> sets?  I'm trying to figure out if it would be faster this way since 
> it should be striping across the two pools (from what I understand). 
> On the other hand, the pool of 3 disks is obviously going to be much 
> slower than the pool of 5.
>
> In a perfect world I'd just benchmark both ways, but due to some 
> constraints, that may not be possible.  Any insight?
>

Hi Tim,

Let me give you a 3rd option for your consideration.  In general, 
there is no "one-pool-fits-all-workloads" solution.  On a 10 disk 
system here, we ended up with a:

5 disk raidz1 pool
2 disk mirror pool
3 disk mirror pool

Each have their strengths/weaknesses.  The raidz set is ideal for 
large file sequential access type workloads - but the IOPS are 
limited to the IOPS of a single drive.  The 3-way mirror is 
ideal for a workload with a high read to write ratio - which describes 
many real-world type workloads (e.g. software development) - since ZFS 
will load balance read ops amoung all members of the mirror set.  So 
read IOPS is 3x the IOPS rating of a single disk.

I would suggest/recommend you configure a 5 disk raidz1 pool (with the 
500Gb disks) and a 2nd pool using a 3-way mirror.  You can then match 
pool/filesystems to the best fit with your different workloads.

Remember the incredibly useful blogs at: http://blogs.sun.com/relling/ 
(Thank you Richard) to determine the relative reliability/failure 
rates of different ZFS configs.

PS: If we had to do it over, I'd probably go with a 6-disk raidz2, 
in place of the 5-disk raidz1 - due to the much higher relibility of 
that config.

Regards,

Al Hopper  Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134  Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/
Graduate from "sugar-coating school"?  Sorry - I never attended! :)
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to