On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 12:11:48 -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: : I'm somewhat surprised its being used as : a counterexample of journaling filesystems being no less reliable than : ZFS. XFS or ReiserFS are both better examples than ext3.
I tend to use XFS on my Linux boxes because of it. ReiserFS I consider dangerous: if merely having an image of a ReiserFS filesystem on a ReiserFS filesystem is enough for fsck to screw everything up, it doesn't pass my 'good gods, just *what* were they *thinking*' test. I'd use XFS or JFS over the others, any day. ZFS would be lovely. Pity about the licence issues. -- Dickon Hood Due to digital rights management, my .sig is temporarily unavailable. Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible. We apologise for the inconvenience in the meantime. No virus was found in this outgoing message as I didn't bother looking. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
