Hmm, I just repeated this test on my system:

bash-3.2# uname -a
SunOS soe-x4200m2-6 5.11 onnv-gate:2007-11-02 i86pc i386 i86xpv

bash-3.2# prtconf | more
System Configuration:  Sun Microsystems  i86pc
Memory size: 7945 Megabytes

bash-3.2# prtdiag | more
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems Sun Fire X4200 M2
BIOS Configuration: American Megatrends Inc. 080012   02/02/2007
BMC Configuration: IPMI 1.5 (KCS: Keyboard Controller Style)

bash-3.2# ptime dd if=/dev/zero of=/xen/myfile bs=16k count=150000
150000+0 records in
150000+0 records out

real       31.927
user        0.689
sys        15.750

bash-3.2# zpool iostat 1

               capacity     operations    bandwidth
pool         used  avail   read  write   read  write
----------  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----
xen         15.3G   121G      0    261      0  32.7M
xen         15.3G   121G      0    350      0  43.8M
xen         15.3G   121G      0    392      0  48.9M
xen         15.3G   121G      0    631      0  79.0M
xen         15.5G   121G      0    532      0  60.1M
xen         15.6G   120G      0    570      0  65.1M
xen         15.6G   120G      0    645      0  80.7M
xen         15.6G   120G      0    516      0  63.6M
xen         15.7G   120G      0    403      0  39.9M
xen         15.7G   120G      0    585      0  73.1M
xen         15.7G   120G      0    573      0  71.7M
xen         15.7G   120G      0    579      0  72.4M
xen         15.7G   120G      0    583      0  72.9M
xen         15.7G   120G      0    568      0  71.1M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    400      0  39.0M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    584      0  73.0M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    568      0  71.0M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    585      0  73.1M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    583      0  72.8M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    665      0  83.2M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    643      0  80.4M
xen         16.1G   120G      0    603      0  75.0M
xen         16.1G   120G      5    526   320K  64.9M
xen         16.7G   119G      0    582      0  68.0M
xen         16.7G   119G      0    639      0  78.5M
xen         16.7G   119G      0    641      0  80.2M
xen         16.7G   119G      0    664      0  83.0M
xen         16.7G   119G      0    629      0  78.5M
xen         16.7G   119G      0    654      0  81.7M
xen         17.2G   119G      0    563  63.4K  63.5M
xen         17.3G   119G      0    525      0  59.2M
xen         17.3G   119G      0    619      0  71.4M
xen         17.4G   119G      0      7      0   448K
xen         17.4G   119G      0      0      0      0
xen         17.4G   119G      0    408      0  51.1M
xen         17.4G   119G      0    618      0  76.5M
xen         17.6G   118G      0    264      0  27.4M
xen         17.6G   118G      0      0      0      0
xen         17.6G   118G      0      0      0      0
xen         17.6G   118G      0      0      0      0
...<ad infinitum>

I don't seem to be experiencing the same result as yourself.

The behaviour of ZFS might vary between invocations, but I don't think that
is related to xVM. Can you get the results to vary when just booting under
"bare metal"?

Gary

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:46:56AM -0700, Martin wrote:
> I've removed half the memory, leaving 4Gb, and rebooted into "Solaris xVM", 
> and re-tried under Dom0.  Sadly, I still get a similar problem.  With "dd 
> if=/dev/zero of=myfile bs=16k count=150000" I get command returning in 15 
> seconds, and "zpool iostat 1 1000" shows 22 records with an IO rate of around 
> 80M, then 209 records of 2.5M (pretty consistent), then the final 11 records 
> climbing to 2.82, 3.29, 3.05, 3.32, 3.17, 3.20, 3.33, 4.41, 5.44, 8.11
> 
> regards
> 
> Martin
>  
>  
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

-- 
Gary Pennington
Solaris Core OS
Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to