On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, A Darren Dunham wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:55:58AM -0700, Scott Laird wrote: >> I'm writing a couple scripts to automate backups and snapshots, and I'm >> finding myself cringing every time I call 'zfs destroy' to get rid of a >> snapshot, because a small typo could take out the original filesystem >> instead of a snapshot. Would it be possible to add a flag (maybe -t <type>) >> to zfs destroy to limit its destructive power? > > It's been discussed (more than once) before. > > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=121336 > > While I thought the general tone from that thread was that such a change > wouldn't be obnoxious, I didn't see if an RFE was filed or any status of > such.
I see that CR 6577055 is somewhat similar, but I can't find any RFE that talks about adding a filter that Scott mentioned (or that was brought up in the thread Darren pointed to). I'll go ahead and write up an RFE. Regards, markm _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
