Hello Richard,

Friday, October 5, 2007, 6:41:10 PM, you wrote:

RE> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello Richard,
>>
>> Friday, September 28, 2007, 7:45:47 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> RE> Kris Kasner wrote:
>>   
>>>>> 2. Back to Solaris Volume Manager (SVM), I guess. It's too bad too, 
>>>>> because I 
>>>>> don't like it with 2 SATA disks either. There isn't enough drives to put 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> State Database Replicas so that if either drive failed, the system would 
>>>>> reboot unattended. Unless there is a trick?
>>>>>         
>>>> There is a trick for this, not sure how long it's been around.
>>>> Add to /etc/system:
>>>> *Allow the system to boot if one of two rootdisks is missing
>>>> set md:mirrored_root_flag=1
>>>>       
>>
>> RE> Before you do this, please read the fine manual:
>> RE> 
>> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2724/chapter2-161?l=en&a=view&q=mirrored_root_flag
>>
>> The description on docs.sun.com is somewhat misleading.
>>
>> http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/io/lvm/md/md_mddb.c#5659
>>    5659                 if (mirrored_root_flag == 1 && setno == 0 &&
>>    5660                     svm_bootpath[0] != 0) {
>>    5661                         md_clr_setstatus(setno, MD_SET_STALE);
>>
>> Looks like it has to be diskset=0 bootpath has to reside on svm device
>> and mirrored_root_flag has to be set to 1.
>>
>> So if you got other disks (>2) in a system just put them in a separate
>> disk group.
>>    
>>
>>    
>>   
RE> If we have more than 2 disks, then we have space for a 3rd metadb copy.
RE>  -- richard

well, depends - if it's external jbod I prefer to put all disks from
that jbod into separate diskset - that way it's easier to move that
jbod or re-install host.

-- 
Best regards,
 Robert                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to