Battery back-ed cache... Interestingly enough, I've seen this configuration in production (V880/SAP on Oracle) running Solaris 8 + Veritas Storage Foundation (for the RAID-1 part).
Speed is good ... redundancy is good ... price is not (2/3). Uptime 499 days :) On 10/9/07, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/6/07, Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I went ahead and loaded 10u4 on a pair of V210 units. > > > > I am going to set this nocacheflush option and cross my fingers and see how > > it goes. > > > > I have my ZPool mirroring LUNs off 2 different arrays. I have > > single-controllers in each 3310. My belief is it's OK for me to do this > > even without dual controllers for NVRAM security. > > > > Worst case I lose an array and/or it's NVRAM contents but the other array > > should be doing it's job as part of the mirroring and I should be all good. > > Does the 3310 have NVRAM or battery backed cache? The latter might be > slightly more dangerous if both arrays lose power together. > > > -- > Just me, > Wire ... > Blog: <prstat.blogspot.com> > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
