Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would know if this is just an accounting-type 
error with the recorded "version=" stored on disk, or if there 
are/could-be any deeper issues with an "upgraded" zpool?

I created a pool under a Sol10_x86_u3 install (11/06?), and zdb correctly 
reported the pool as a "version=3" pool.  I reinstalled the OS with a u4 
(08/07), ran zpool grade, was told I successfully upgraded from version 3 
to version 4, but zdb reported "version=3".  I unmounted the zfs, 
remounted, and zdb still reported "version=3".  I reran zpool upgrade, and 
was told there were no pools to upgrade.

I blew away that pool, and created a new pool and zdb correctly reported 
"version=4".

Perhaps I'm being pedantic, but the version thing on an upgraded pool 
bugged me ;-)

Does anyone have any thoughts/experiences on other surprises that may be 
lying in wait on an "upgraded" zpool?

Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to