>Mounts under /net are derived from the filesystems actually shared >from the servers; the automount daemon uses the MOUNT protocol to >determine this. If you're looking at a path not already seen, the >information will be fresh, but that's where the good news ends. >We don't refresh this information reliably, so if you add a new >share in a directory we've already scanned, you won't see it until >the mounts time out and are removed. We should refresh this data >more readily and no matter what the source of data.
I know that, yes, but why can't we put such an abstraction elsewhere in the name space? One thing I have always disliked about /net mounts is that they're too magical; it should be possible to replicate them in some form in other mount maps. Casper _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
