Rainer

Try this explanation..

Host A mounts UFS file system rw
Hosts B-C mount sam UFS file system read only

In natural scheme of things hosts B-C read files and cache metadata about the files and file system.

Host A changes the file system. The metadata that hosts B-C have cached is now incorrect. If they go to access the file system and find that its state has changed things can start to go wrong.

Global file systems like QFS have can have one writer and multiple readers as above and the readers can be configured to cache no metadata..or just cache is for a very short time...all is well.

Global file systems can also have multiple readers and writers which require more complex mechanisms to maintain consistency. In the case of QFS that requires a server to own the file system metadata and all clients have to get information about the file system metadata from the metadata server. This is done over the network and the transfer the actual data blocks is done over the SAN.

HTH

Tim


Rainer J.H. Brandt said the following :
Sorry, this is a bit off-topic, but anyway:

Ronald Kuehn writes:
  
No. You can neither access ZFS nor UFS in that way. Only one
host can mount the file system at the same time (read/write or
read-only doesn't matter here).
    

I can see why you wouldn't recommend trying this with UFS
(only one host knows which data has been committed to the disk),
but is it really impossible?

I don't see why multiple UFS mounts wouldn't work, if only one
of them has write access.  Can you elaborate?

Thanks,
Rainer Brandt
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
  

--
Signature
Sun Logo
Tim Thomas
Storage Systems Product Group
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Internal Extension: x(70)18097
Office Direct Dial: +44-161-905-8097
Mobile: +44-7802-212-209
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to