On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:39:26PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote: > Jeff Bachtel wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:38:17AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote: > >>can you see the LUN in format? > > > >Yes. Additionally, I can dd from the rdsk device to a file, and get > >enough data to confirm that the disk devices are members of the old > >zpools, and still have data. > > OK, I suspect the complaint is because ZFS sees the exact same ID > on both drives.
Which ID would that be, and which drives? I've updated one of the systems to snv 72, and I'm still getting the "Create devinfo" warning, and the imports are still not going. cfgadm seems, sane, a la: imsfs-mirror:~> sudo cfgadm -la c2 Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition c2 fc-fabric connected configured unknown c2::21000004d9600099 disk connected configured unknown c2::21000004d960cded disk connected configured unknown devinfo, once I figured out how to call it, also seems sane: imsfs-mirror:~> sudo devinfo -i /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 0 0 32130 512 2 imsfs-mirror:~> sudo devinfo -p /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 36 682 0 1465031610 0 5 As I mentioned, I can dd the raw device and get valid data (although I've no way to verify that ZFS metadata is at the beginning of the disks). Is there a documented example of using DTrace to examine what zpool is seeing/discarding while it scans for pools? One of these ZFS pools had its members totally renamed (the port used on the disk array got switched, and so the WWN changed), but the other should still be the same. I'm close to downgrading to snv_69 on one of the machines to see if it can import the pools, but after doing some research it seems that other people have had mysterious import problems that never resolved. (Richard, I'm sending this back to zfs-discuss, but only because I added more debug info that might mean something to someone else.) Jeff > -- richard -- Jeff Bachtel ([EMAIL PROTECTED],TAMU) http://www.cepheid.org/~jeff "The sciences, each straining in [finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key] its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little;" - HPL, TCoC _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
