Hello Gino,

Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 10:43:17 AM, you wrote:

>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:43:39PM -0700, Anton B.
>> Rang wrote:
>> > 
>> > That's only one cause of panics.
>> > 
>> > At least two of gino's panics appear due to
>> corrupted space maps, for
>> > instance. I think there may also still be a case
>> where a failure to
>> > read metadata during a transaction commit leads to
>> a panic, too. Maybe
>> > that one's been fixed, or maybe it will be handled
>> by the above bug.
>> 
>> The space map bugs should have been fixed as part of:
>> 
>> 6458218 assertion failed: ss == NULL
>> 
>> Which went into Nevada build 60.  There are several
>> different
>> pathologies that can result from this bug, and I
>> don't know if the
>> panics are from before or after this fix. 

G> If that can help you, we are able to corrupt a zpool on snv_60 doing the 
following a few times:

G> -create a raid10 zpool   (dual path luns)
G> -making a high writing load on that zpool
G> -disabling fc ports on both the fc switches

G> Each time we get a kernel panic, probably because of 6322646, and
G> sometimes we get a corrupted zpool.

Is it still the case? Was the problem of corruption the pool addressed
and hopefully solved?



-- 
Best regards,
 Robert Milkowski                      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to