MC <rac <at> eastlink.ca> writes:
> 
> Obviously 7zip is far more CPU-intensive than anything in use with ZFS
> today.  But maybe with all these processor cores coming down the road,
> a high-end compression system is just the thing for ZFS to use.

I am not sure you realize the scale of things here. Assuming the worst case: 
that lzjb (default ZFS compression algorithm) performs as bad as lha in [1], 
7zip would compress your data only 20-30% better at the cost of being 4x-5x 
slower !

Also, in most cases, the bottleneck in data compression is the CPU, so 
switching to 7zip would reduce the I/O throughput by about 4x.

[1] http://warp.povusers.org/ArchiverComparison

-marc

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to