I wonder what kind of card Peter's using and if there is a potential
linkage there.  We've got the Sun branded Emulux cards in our sparcs.  I
also wonder if Peter were able to allocate an additional LUN to his
system whether or not he'd be able to create a pool on that new LUN.

I'm not sure why exactly they were chosen over the qlogic, some of our
admins swear by the qlogic cards, others have have had bad experiences
with the qlogic cards not allowing for persistent binding on some
configurations, but from my perspective being mostly a SAN noob it's all
hearsay. 


--
Sean M. Alderman
513.204.2704

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:58 PM
To: Alderman, Sean
Cc: Peter Tribble; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and powerpath

Hmm.  Odd.  I've got PowerPath working fine with ZFS with both Symmetrix
and Clariion back ends.
PowerPath Version is 4.5.0, running on leadville qlogic drivers.   
Sparc hardware.  (if it matters)

I ran one our test databases on ZFS on the DMX via PowerPath for a
couple months until we switched off of it because of the 'bogus memory
usage' statistics problem.  We still use it on a server we use for logs
processing and retention that uses the Clariion as a back end.

cheers,
Brian


On Jul 13, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Alderman, Sean wrote:

> There was a Sun Forums post that I referenced in that other thread 
> that mentioned something about mpxio working but powerpath not 
> working.  Of course I don't know how valid those statements are/were, 
> and I don't recall much detail given.
>
>
> --
> Sean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Tribble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 11:53 AM
> To: Alderman, Sean
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and powerpath
>
> On 7/13/07, Alderman, Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You wouldn't happen to be running this on a SPARC would you?
>
> That I would.
>
>> I started a thread last week regarding CLARiiON+ZFS+SPARC = core dump

>> when creating a zpool.  I filed a bug report, though it doesn't 
>> appear
>
>> to be in the database (not sure if that means it was rejected or I 
>> didn't submit it correctly).
>
> I'm not seeing it quite like that. ZFS+mpxio works, ZFS+powerpath 
> seems to have "issues".
>
>> Also, I was using the powerpath psuedo device not the WWN though.
>
> I've not got that far. During an import, ZFS just pokes around - there

> doesn't seem to be an explicit way to tell it which particular devices

> or SAN paths to use.
>
> --
> -Peter Tribble
> http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ 
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to