Martin Man wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> it might be a faq or known problem, but it's rather dangerous, is this >>> being worked ON? usb stick removal should not panic the kernel, should >> it? >> >> I think the default behavior is that if the pool is unprotected (or at an >> unprotected state via redundancy failure on mirror or raidz(2)) and you >> lose a device the system panics. This is a known issue/bug/feature (pick >> one depending on your view) that has been discussed multiple times on the >> list. > > discussed yes, I think I remember that, reported? being worked on?
Martin, see: 6322646 ZFS should gracefully handle all devices failing (when writing) Menno -- Menno Lageman - Sun Microsystems - http://blogs.sun.com/menno _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
