> (4+1)*2 is 2x faster, and in theory is less likely to have wasted space > in transaction group (unlikely seen) > (4+1)*2 is cheaper to upgrade in place because of its fewer elements I'm aware of these benefits but I feel that having one large lun is easier to manage - in that I can allocate the entrire array's storage arbitrarily... I fear that if I split the array in half, I might end up with not enough space on one side and too much on the other. Otherwise, I'd do this in a heartbeat...
Any advice? Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
