Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 23:03 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >Maybe some additional pragmatism is called for here. If we want NFS
> > >over ZFS to work well for a variety of clients, maybe we should set
> > >st_size to larger values..
> >
> > +1; let's teach the admins to do " st_size /= 24" mentally :-)
>
> Mental long division is annoying. Memory is cheap. And ls displays
> file lengths in decimal.
>
> if we want this to be a geek-friendly interface perhaps we should
> multiply by 100 rather than 24.
I believe we should rather educate other people that st_size/24 is a bad
"solution".
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
