On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Richard Elling wrote:
Chris Csanady wrote:
I was quoting the random write IOPS number at 4kB. The theoretical
sequential write bandwidth is fine, but I don't think that 15 IOPS can
be considered respectable.
This is where ZFS could be a good thing. ZFS doesn't generally do small,
random writes. If we get 15 random write iops at 128kBytes, then it
is more reasonable.
Has anyone been able to get a sample Sandisk to evaluate?
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
