Hello Richard, Thursday, May 24, 2007, 6:10:34 PM, you wrote:
RE> Incidentally, thumper field reliability is better than we expected. This is causing RE> me to do extra work, because I have to explain why. I've got some thumpers and there're very reliable. Even disks aren't failing that much - even less than I expected from observation on other arrays in the same environment. The main problems with x4500+zfs are: 1. hot spare support in zfs - right now it is far from ideal 2. raidz2 - resilver with lot of small files takes too long 3. SVM root disk mirror over jumpstart doesn't work with x4500 (bug opened) 4. I would consider future version of x4500 to have a 2xCF card (or something similar) to boot system from - so two disk won't be wasted just for OS (2x1TB in a few months). -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
