performance. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: 3sm4u3 X-OpenSolaris-URL: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=123265&tstart=0#123265
> > Or if you do want to use bfu because you really want to match your > > source code revisions up to a given day then you will need to build the > > ON consolidation yourself and you an the install the non debug bfu > > archives (note you will need to download the non debug closed bins to do > > that). > > The README.opensolaris > (http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/README.opensolaris) > still states: > 2. Non-DEBUG kernel builds have not been tested. Systems that require > the ata driver are known not to work with non-DEBUG builds. > Are debug builds now know to work? s/debug/non-debug/ That used to be true, but is obsolete by now. non-debug builds work just fine. Just make sure to use a recent on-closed-bins-nd*.tar.bz2 archive, e.g. http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b63/on-closed-bins-nd-b63.i386.tar.bz2 The ata driver has moved from the closed bits tree to the standard/open onnv source tree, so when you compile non-DEBUG bits, you'll also get a non-DEBUG ata driver compiled from source. There used to be a problem when ata was closed, and you tried to compile non-DEBUG opensolaris from sources and mixed that with a DEBUG ata driver from the closed bits archive. That was a problem when no closed non-debug bits (on-closed-bins-nd-*.tar.bz2) were available for download. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
