Sorry, I'm fairly new to Solaris... I'm not sure if it's using the ata
driver or sata driver. Here are my current disks (0,1, and 2 are the
sata disks):

AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
      0. c0d0 <Maxtor 6-L59LQ0W-0001-233.76GB>
         /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0
      1. c0d1 <Maxtor 6-L59MD11-0001-233.76GB>
         /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0
      2. c1d0 <Maxtor 6-L59M4DQ-0001-233.76GB>
         /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0
      3. c2d0 <DEFAULT cyl 2488 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>
         /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0
Specify disk (enter its number):

Since they are labeled as "pci-ide" is it safe to assume they are
using the ide/ata driver? If so, is there a performance gain when
using a sata driver?


On 5/21/07, Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christopher Gibbs wrote:
> XIU, I'm currently using that card with my modest three-disk raid-z
> home server and it works great! Solaris 10 had native support for it
> so no need to mess with drivers.

By "native support", I assume you mean IDE/ATA driver support ("ata" in
modinfo), not SATA driver support. But I'd love to be wrong ;-)

> On 5/20/07, XIU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> About sata controllers, anyone tried
>> 
http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?segment=Non-RAID%20HBAs&product_id=139#
>>
>> ? It sells here for like 90euro so would be a cheap way for me to add
>> some
>> extra harddrives for a personal zfs server.

--
Carson
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss



--
Christopher Gibbs
Email / LDAP Administrator
Web Integration & Programming
Abilene Christian University
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to