Hello Phillip,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 6:30:38 PM, you wrote:

PF> [b]Given[/b]:  A Solaris 10 u3 server with an externally attached
PF> disk array with RAID controller(s)

PF> [b]Question[/b]:  Is it better to create a zpool from a
PF> [u]single[/u] external LUN on an external disk array, or is it
PF> better to use no RAID on the disk array and just present
PF> individual disks to the server and let ZFS take care of the RAID?


There's no simple answer :)))
Depends on things like what kind of RAID you want to use and what is
your IO characteristic. For example if you want to use RAID-5 and you
are issuing lot of small asynchronous writes then RAID-Z should give
you more performance than HW RAID-5. But if you want RAID-5 and lot of
concurent random small reads then HW RAID-5 will be generally better
than RAID-Z. If your workload is mixed then... well. However putting
ZFS on top of HW RAID-5 in many cases mitigates write problem due to
"converting" most random writes into sequential aggregated writes.

Then other thing - do you use SATA disks? How much data loss or
corruption is an issue for you? Doing software RAID in ZFS can detect
AND correct such problems. HW RAID also can but to much less extent.

On the other hand current hot spare support in ZFS is lacking and
generally when it comes to data availability HW RAID offers better hot
spare support. It's being worked on.

But you may want to buy JBOD and not spend money on controllers which
can save you some money. Then once your environment grows and you end
up with many arrays from different vendors going with SW solutions
simplifies and unifies storage management.

Se my blog for some performance comparisons for HW RAID vs. SW RAID in
ZFS.


PF> [b]Example[/b]:  I have a Solaris 10 server with an attached 3320
PF> disk array and want to use ZFS instead of UFS.  Should I create a
PF> single RAID protected LUN on the 3320 and build a single disk ZFS
PF> pool on it, or should I setup each disk in the 3320 as an "NRAID"
PF> (aka individual disk) to be used by the server in a multi-disk zfs pool?

see above


Personally I would go with ZFS entirely in most cases.

-- 
Best regards,
 Robert Milkowski                      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to