Hello Victor, Thursday, May 10, 2007, 11:26:35 AM, you wrote:
VL> Robert Milkowski wrote: >> Hello Leon, >> >> Thursday, May 10, 2007, 10:43:27 AM, you wrote: >> >> LM> Hello, >> >> LM> I've got some weird problem: ZFS does not seem to be utilizing >> LM> all disks in my pool properly. For some reason, it's only using 2 of the >> 3 disks in my pool: >> >> LM> capacity operations bandwidth >> LM> pool used avail read write read write >> LM> ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >> LM> database 8.48G 1.35T 202 0 12.4M 0 >> LM> c0t1d0 4.30G 460G 103 0 6.21M 0 >> LM> c0t3d0 4.12G 460G 96 0 6.00M 0 >> LM> c0t2d0 54.9M 464G 2 0 190K 0 >> LM> ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >> >> LM> I've added all the disks at the same time, so it's not like the >> LM> last disk was added later. Any ideas on what might be causing this ? I'm >> using solaris express b62. >> LM> >> >> Your third disks is 4GB larger that first two disks and ZFS tries to >> "load-balance" data so that you can fill up all devices. As you've >> already have about 4GB on each of the first two disks ZFS should start >> to use third disks after copying addtitional data. VL> No, it is not - other two disks have 4G out of 464G used, and disk in VL> question has only 55M used. So for me it does not look like weighting VL> problem. This is something else I believe. VL> I'm not sure but i suspect this may be somehow related to meta data VL> allocation, given that ZFS stores two copies for file system meta data. VL> But this is nothing more than a wild guess. VL> Leon, What kind of data is stored in this pool? What Solaris version are VL> you using? How is your pool configured? Yep, that's available space not a size - you're right, my fault. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
