Roch Bourbonnais wrote: > > with recent bits ZFS compression is now handled concurrently with many > CPUs working on different records. > So this load will burn more CPUs and acheive it's results > (compression) faster. > Would changing (selecting a smaller) filesystem record size have any effect?
> So the observed pauses should be consistent with that of a load > generating high system time. > The assumption is that compression now goes faster than when is was > single threaded. > > Is this undesirable ? We might seek a way to slow down compression in > order to limit the system load. > I think you should, otherwise we have a performance throttle that scales with the number of cores! Ian _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss