Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
>
> with recent bits ZFS compression is now handled concurrently with many
> CPUs working on different records.
> So this load will burn more CPUs and acheive it's results
> (compression) faster.
>
Would changing (selecting a smaller) filesystem record size have any effect?

> So the observed pauses should be consistent with that of a load
> generating high system time.
> The assumption is that compression now goes faster than when is was
> single threaded.
>
> Is this undesirable ? We might seek a way to slow down compression in
> order to limit the system load.
>
I think you should, otherwise we have a performance throttle that scales
with the number of cores!

Ian

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to