On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 05:02:47PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: > > In practical terms, backing up much over a terabyte > in a single chunk isn't ideal. What I would like to see > here is more flexibility from something like Legato > in terms of defining schedules that would allow us to > back this up sensibly. (Basically, the changes are > relatively small, so it would be nice to use quarterly > schedules - Legato only really does weekly or monthly.)
So what you *really* want is TSM. I wonder if IBM would ever consider supporting ZFS. -brian -- "Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant. In the hands of a skilled artisan, it can and does happen; it's just that most of the shit out there is built by people who'd be better suited to making sure that my burger is cooked thoroughly." -- Jonathan Patschke _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
