> > So, at this point in time that seems pretty > discouraging for an everyday user, on Linux. > > nobody told, that zfs-fuse is ready for an everyday > user at it`s current state ! ;)
That's what I found out, wanted to share and get other's opinion on. I did not complain. I thought it might work, it might not, so I tried. BTW last night I tried ZFS on FreeBSD 7. I got a panic when trying to make it import my existing pool at first. Then I tried again another way and did get it to recognize it. My simple, non-representative performance measurement was even slower than zfs-fuse (something like 4-5 minutes for the find, no apparent caching effect), and I had many USB read errors along the way as well. It looks like FBSD 7 with ZFS is even more immature than zfs-fuse at this time. That's ok, it is a CVS snapshot of FreeBSD "CURRENT" after all. I have been a long time happy FreeBSD user before I switched to Ubuntu, I am definitely not complaining about this. Sometimes things work, sometimes not. I guess I will still checkout OpenSolaris once my download finishes. I'm in experimentation mood :) > although it runs pretty stable for now, there still > remain major issues and especially, it`s not yet > being optimized for performance. > you should give it some more time, perhaps > performance will get better one day if there is some > work put into this. I think that will happen. There's much talking about it already. My perspective currently is to find something for my own everyday use. That's for today, not forever. I may change again later. As I said, I am somewhat in experimentation mood. Thanks for your comments. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
