> > Is ZFS really supposed to be more reliable than UFS > w/ logging, for > > example, in single disk, root file system scenario? > > Yes. The failure to cope with a failed write in an > unreplicated pool > affects the availability of the system (because we > panic), but not the > underlying reliability of the filesystem.
Eric, we had 5 corrupted zpool (on different servers and different SANs) ! With Solaris up to S10U3 and Nevada up to snv59 we are able to corrupt easily a zpool only disconnecting a few times one or more luns of a zpool under high i/o load. We are testing now snv60. gino This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
