Matty wrote:
On 4/20/07, George Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a high priority for us and is actively being worked.
Vague enough for you. :-) Sorry I can't give you anything more exact
that that.
Hi George,
If ZFS is supposed to be part of "open"solaris, then why can't the
community get additional details? If really seems like much of the
development and design of ZFS goes on behind closed doors, and the
community as a whole is involved after the fact (Eric Shrock has
requested feedback from list members, which is awesome!). This makes
it difficult for folks to contribute, and to offer suggestions (or
code) that would better ZFS as a whole. Is there a reason that more of
the ZFS development discussions aren't occuring in public?
I can't speak for the zpool-shrink work, but I've been inspired (partly
by this post) to start collecting more input from the community regarding
the use of zfs as a root file system. I've just started a blog
(http://blogs.sun.com/lalt/) and I'll be putting out posts
there and on this alias regarding some of the design issues that need
to get resolved. So watch for it.
Lori
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
