To give you fine people an update, it seems that the reason for the skewed 
results shown earlier is due to Veritas' ability to take advantage of all the 
free memory available on my server. My test system has 32G of Ram, and my test 
data file is 10G. Basically, Veritas was able to cache the entire data file. 


On the suggestion that I use a larger data file, I have increased the file to 
100G and have re-run my Veritas tests with an 8k File Block and 8k Request 
Block size. In doing this, I have run into a different issue, which I have now 
resolved. That being - my server became fully unresponsive during testing! 
Basically, Veritas allowed itself to consume all the memory of my server, all 
32G, and then when it had used all of its memory, it looked for more and hung 
the server due to resource contention. To alleviate this problem, I tuned the 
Veritas file system using the write_throttle tunable. I first set this to be 
99.5% of my Ram,  then 50% and now I am running at about 256Mb (32651 pages). 

 
The reason I had decreased the values down to the current (32651) page size is 
that, while the server would be responsive, my test volume would not be so. It 
took 35 minutes for the paging to stop when I had set the write_throttle to 50% 
of Ram, and only after that paging completed did the test resume. At the 
current value, the test will continue for a period, then flush, continue, etc. 

 
Given my current configuration, I now see an IO rate of 756 versus my prior 
27,329!!!

 
I am continuing my testing, and will re-test UFS and ZFS with the larger file 
size as well to properly discover the differences. Also, in subsequent testing, 
I will also test with a full un-buffered Veritas & UFS volume to compare with 
ZFS, which may be a more reasonable test due to ZFS's copy-on-write 
architecture.


I will send out the full results when they are compiled.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to