Hello Spencer, Thursday, April 19, 2007, 2:28:30 AM, you wrote:
SS> On Apr 18, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote: >> Hello Carson, >> >> Thursday, April 19, 2007, 1:22:17 AM, you wrote: >> >> CG> Robert Milkowski wrote: >> >>>> We did some tests with Linux (2.4 and 2.6) and it seems there's a >>>> problem if you have thousands of nfs file systems - they won't >>>> all be >>>> mounted automatically, and even doing it manually (or in a script >>>> with >>>> a sleep between each mount) there seems to be a limit below 1000. We >>>> did not investigate further as in that environment all nfs >>>> clients are >>>> Solaris server (x86, sparc) and we see no problems with thousands of >>>> file systems. >> >> CG> The Linux limitation is possibly due to privileged port >> exhaustion with >> CG> TCP mounts, FYI. >> >> >> We've been thinking about the same lines (1024-some services already >> running). >> >> But still with few hundreds nfs entries Linux time outs end you end up >> with some file system not mounted, etc. SS> See the Linux NFS FAQ at http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ SS> Question/Answer B3. There is a limit of a few hundred SS> NFS mounts. Thanks. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
