On 17-Apr-07, at 2:00 PM, Rayson Ho wrote:
On 4/17/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OS X tends to effectively elide the "book larning" part of using
UNIX. I don't think ZFS would be any exception - they won't ship
until "you don't even know it's there".
But then, I have helped people "fixing" their computers by emptying
the recycle bin!!
There are things I'd change in OS X. But for "everyman," it beats
everything else, especially of course Windows. For power users too,
but that's another topic.
I think ZFS helps the filesystem layer become more reliable, self-
tuning, and invisible... consistent with OS X's general approach, IMHO.
Apple is integrating DTrace too, and yet I don't see more than 10% of
the Mac users writing "D" programs.
I don't see more than 1 in 10000 doing it :-)
--Toby
Rayson
--Toby
>
> Rayson
>
>
>
>> (A close 2nd for me personally is the
>> ease of creating mirrors, but granted that's on my servers rather
>> than
>> my desktop.)
>>
>> --
>> Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
>>
>> CEO,
>> My Online Home Inventory
>>
>> Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
>> URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
>> http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
