On 12-Apr-07, at 8:34 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ignatich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
There is a lot of missunderstandings with the GPL.
Porting ZFS to Linux wouldnotmake ZFS a "derived work" from Linux.
I do not see why anyone could claim that there is a need to
publish ZFS under
GPL in case you use it on Linux. The CDDL however allows you to
use it together
with _any_ other license. So where is the problem?
You may have a perfectly valid point. ATI and nVidia both provide
non-GPL drivers for Linux. But I don't think it's that easy. You
can't
port a file system to Linux without using EXPORT_GPL APIs. That means
Linux developers view such code as "derived work". I prefer to be
safe
than sorry.
Authors/porters from Europe definitely have the right to use small
parts of
other people's code as ("wissenschaftliches Kleinzitat") and do not
even ask
the author for permission as long as the mention him.
As long as nobody like to combine the Linux and the ZFS project
into one single
"work", I see no problems.
Yes, I think this principle is what permits ZFS/FUSE.
--T (who INAL).
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling
D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://
schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/
pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
