Hello Adam, Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 11:41:58 PM, you wrote:
AL> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:04:06PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: >> If I stop all activity to x4500 with a pool made of several raidz2 and >> then I issue spare attach I get really poor performance (1-2MB/s) on a >> pool with lot of relatively small files. AL> Does that mean the spare is resilvering when you collect the performance AL> data? I think a fair test would be to compare the performance of a fully AL> functional RAID-Z stripe against a one with a missing (absent) device. Sorry, I wasn't clear. I'm not talking about performance while spare is resilvering. I'm talking about resilver performance itself while all other IOs are absent. Resilver itself is slow (lot of files) with raidz2 here. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
